Re: [Specifications] Add Use Case: Creating events indirectly (ie. with PUT)

Review status: 0 of 1 files reviewed at latest revision, 15 unresolved discussions.

---

*[drafts/use-cases/5.1.creating-new-event-indirectly.md, line 115 at r1](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/143#-KxY28Opn5nMlgaMrFGV-r1-115:-KxitK9fZt2u7elmGmSc:bodyqcp) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/f03e3028e6417adf2767a44c0c854b4af3b5fb4d/drafts/use-cases/5.1.creating-new-event-indirectly.md#L115)):*
<details><summary><i>Previously, alien-mcl (Karol Szczepański) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote>

I agree with @elf-pavlik - HTTP `If-Match` header seems to fit better.
</blockquote></details>

FYI, actually it's `If-None-Match: *`, which prevents an update if any representation exists.

---


*Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/143)*
<!-- Sent from Reviewable.io -->


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/143#issuecomment-340568386 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 30 October 2017 20:08:09 UTC