- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:21:00 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
I believe so. It's still RDF after all. I remember also that for client simplicity we agreed that these kind of statements should be explicit so client doesn't need to use any reasoning to find it out. >I find the proposed foo:Link and foo:Unlink too generic and with too loose semantics. Although they too >could be useful Well, I'd prefer generic simple operations so a generic client can still do something about it. Server could still provide more semantic operations extending a base set. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/134#issuecomment-335031184 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 8 October 2017 19:20:50 UTC