Re: [Specifications] Adding already existing resources as collection members

> PUT would happen on a resource which doesn't event exist #141 and client would need a URI Template

NIT: Not necessarily. Imagine this. If the authenticated user is `/users/elfpavlik` and that user requested `GET /videos/144522067`. The representation of the latter could include a `sor:likes` `PUT` operation on resource `/users/elfpavlik/likes/144522067`. No need for a template.

I find the proposed `foo:Link` and `foo:Unlink` too generic and with too loose semantics. Although they too could be useful

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/134#issuecomment-335021516 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 8 October 2017 17:11:17 UTC