- From: Dietrich Schulten via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:27:22 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Well it is clear that so far no one shares my idea of a hydra client interface. I have no problem with that. I want us to make progress here, not to defend my ideas. My focus is to get a reference client implementation so that we can *verify the Hydra spec* and find out what is really needed. I do not think it is essential for the purpose of verification of the Hydra vocab which metaphor the client abstraction uses or which method signatures it has. We are again splitting hairs, and I am not going to waste any more time on that. How about someone else spells out his idea of a client interface? Or can we just adopt heracles as the reference client? Can we please decide *anything* which moves us forward? I am extremely frustrated with the way the group un-collaborates. No offense intended. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dschulten Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/111#issuecomment-289364622 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 27 March 2017 06:27:29 UTC