RE: Notice of CFC: Make previous versions of HTML and XHTML obsolete

Leonie,

I think it would have been best, and I would have appreciated you receiving my answer to your response before finalizing this CFC, as, I was not satisfied with the responses to my objection.

HTML 5.0 is only 3 years old and 5.1 is less than 1.

No, I do not agree, but I suppose I can object when it goes to the AC, which would be unfortunate. I am not certain that Knowbility will formally object, but there is no reason to obsolete the current 5.0 specs.

​​​​​* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog

NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and - that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque Systems.


-----Original Message-----
From: Léonie Watson [mailto:tink@tink.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:32 PM
To: public-webapps@w3.org; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Notice of CFC: Make previous versions of HTML and XHTML obsolete

This is notice that this CFC is now closed. It received numerous positive responses, and two partial objections.

The CFC passed, but the response to the objections and other details can be found in the official notice:
https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/issues/86#issuecomment-316506635




On 11/07/2017 22:14, Léonie Watson wrote:
> This is notice that a Call For Consensus (CFC) has been posted here:
> https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/issues/86
> 
> Please respond to the CFC by end of day on Tuesday 18th July 2017.
> 
> Thank you.

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem

Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 22:11:30 UTC