Fwd: Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review of HTML 5.2 (previously 5.1) (#119)

Feedback on HTML5.2 from the TAG.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:  Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG Review of HTML 5.2 (previously 
5.1) (#119)
Date:  Thu, 27 Apr 2017 22:23:05 -0700
From:  Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To:  w3ctag/design-reviews 
<reply+00356be91995c2cf0cae940c0e2b3bf5e7f98a1b3f4d78a192cf00000001151a93b992a16>
To:  w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
CC:  Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>, Mention <mention@noreply.github.com>



We reviewed the 5.2 Change Log in the TAG f2f.

Herewith out notes:

Sangwhan: about:html-kind - we think it's unclear what it's supposed to 
do ... We'll ask for clarifiication...

Concern expressed about whether apple-touch-icon-sizes should be in the 
spec - vendor specific naming... - please deprecate in favor of manifests?
Maybe switch to a non-normative or a conformance appendix? A 
compatibility module or companion note? (see, e.g., ECMA-262 Annex B: 
https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-additional-ecmascript-features-for-web-browsers 
or https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/)

Question on DL – why doesn't it allow all elements as children?
cf https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/dl
Why cant a custom element be put there? What's the protocol that a

or a
are adhereing
too that other elements don't or can't? Why isn't that explained? Is 
there a data structure that gets modified when a dt/dd are added under a

? These questions get to a larger question of extensibility.

Why aren't defn's allowed in a lot more places?
For example, In specs themselves, defns are often used where they are 
not technically allowed
Maybe this should be fixed to reflect real usage?

Make style in body confirming
The commit is missing?

rel extensions - this should go in the list of things that needs a 
maintenance registry rather than a wiki
Which we will take up and make recommendations about in the future.

Summary activation algorithm : Sangwhan is taking an exta look at this...

Comments, @LJWatson <https://github.com/LJWatson>?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
<https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/119#issuecomment-297909765>, 
or mute the thread 
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADVr6UpNUG6xEkNNfqtFLR67gu2-vBv3ks5r0Xe5gaJpZM4IbXe4>.

Received on Sunday, 30 April 2017 18:17:31 UTC