Re: nav > ul is sometimes redundant

Patrick, yes, I was suggesting adding it to HTML5.

Marat, that works too. I also that of that.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru> wrote:

> 03.09.2015, 16:53, "Matt Di Pasquale" <liveloveprosper@gmail.com>:
> > <nav>
> >   <ul>
> >     <li><a href="/">Home</a></li>
> >     <li><a href="/about">About</a></li>
> >     <li><a href="/contact">Contact</a></li>
> >   </ul>
> > </nav>
> >
> > Why do I need the extra nav element? Wouldn't it be simpler if I could
> remove the nav element and perhaps replace the ul element with an nl
> element?
>
> Instead of inventing another navigation-semantics element like `NL`, it
> would probably be more reasonable to be able to omit nested `UL` and put
> `LI` items directly inside `NAV`.
>