- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:29:16 +0000
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- CC: "tsiegman@wiley.com" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, "mgylling@daisy.org" <mgylling@daisy.org>, "matt.garrish@bell.net" <matt.garrish@bell.net>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
> On Mar 9, 2015, at 23:21, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > 4. Several of the roles are probably too specific. "learning-outcome" and "learning- > objective" for example. > I agree. Does this document include roles intended to fulfill the requirements of EduPub? These are the only specifically educational concepts proposed. If there are going to be more of them, we should review them all before deciding which merit inclusion in the pub ARIA taxonomy. > 6. "landmarks" is going to confuse a lot of authors. > Yes, particularly as the concept of a “landmark role” is fundamental to the ARIA spec. Having a role called “landmark” would detract from conceptual clarity where it is most needed. > 7. A non-abstract role name "abstract" is defined immediately after a sentence stating: > "Abstract roles are used for the ontology. Authors must not use abstract roles in > content." I recommend picking a different name, perhaps dpub-summary? > Definitely. Perhaps “synopsis” would be a more appropriate term. > ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 13:29:48 UTC