- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:11:27 +0200
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, 'Daniel Glazman' <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, 'Jirka Kosek' <jirka@kosek.cz>, chaals@yandex-team.ru, 'Philippe Le Hegaret' <plh@w3.org>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Hi John, On 16/09/2014 21:40 , John Foliot wrote: > I am all in favor of having spec-build snapshots for those who dance on the > edges every day: we need those developers to help blaze the new trail. But we > also need a stable and fixed "Standard", not some amorphous digital crib-sheet > posing as a standard. So... I'm not hearing you suggesting we do anything other than the outlined plan. We have the bleeding edge specs for those who need them, we have the process to publish those as snapshots. People who need one or the other can be pointed in the right direction (which is part of the reason for making them look different — they're different products). In addition to that Jirka's suggestion of keeping up to date information on which features work where ought to be extremely useful precisely to anyone who doesn't have the bandwidth to read all the new standards and all the release notes of the browsers and all the cool blogs, etc. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 10:11:43 UTC