- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:36:05 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, chaals@yandex-team.ru, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 16/09/2014 18:26, Jirka Kosek wrote: > If we go with modular approach (which I'm quite supportive), we > should have page which for each feature lists how mature it is and > what browsers are already support it. Of course this a lot of > working, a lot of testing, ..., but only implemented features count > and this is what's important to average Joe developer. Exactly. And that's the reaason why I recommended using the unused html.org </Daniel> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUGGb1AAoJECLNIcsk94JcQ7AIAKtUdPgUpc+V75GDlML8zi77 9Gtc5bJwuOtztRWnP5sGcRse3f3cbqPTVyp61r1KQ6va0vy5sKphGzB9umxb0XI+ C6sDlzTd58FlFwvlOeEa5/LbBaeENwbV6uyfBiU7qSI79REIgQGOgYdkBPVvLDym 7zrI+aODL/spIWmXfntm5aTkrcLuzAQnxcyJh9EJ2WNSee3MQMMaYHKN0vFlR32I Db/NmqkQqDMz1cixqmUejfCL3Kck3YS6i56GGFXgCwS6VWn92vmvAvl0yrI0u20b bNPxU6ivMxFTogJzcp4gj+i9eaMjlWlJPIRIti4mEnpqM/pGjmZC7T1kxw34R4s= =lzZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 16:36:32 UTC