W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2014

Re: Document.createElement: null or HTML namespace?

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:13:59 -0400
Message-ID: <1412777639.3340.3.camel@chacal>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 11:17 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
> The inconsistency of the decision points me to prefer null.
> 
> Also, as a data point, DOM 3 Core would say null.
> 
> So all in all I would lean towards systematically using null.

I like the presto approach but since it doesn't match anyone else, I say
+1 on your suggestion.

> NB: the spec also claims that XMLDocument.load() is relied upon by 
> content in the wild. Is that really true? It's broken almost everywhere 
> and strikes me a particularly useless.

Did you look to see if we have a test for this?

Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 14:14:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:40 UTC