- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 21:07:28 +0300
- To: public-html@w3.org
The document "Using WAI-ARIA in HTML" http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-in-html/ says in clause2.5 (Add ARIA inline or via script?) that ARIA attributes should be added via scripting, not as "inline" (as attributes in HTML tags), except when a) the attribute "does not rely on scripting to provide interaction behaviour" or b) "the content and interaction is only supported in a scripting enabled browsing context", in which cases "it is safe" to include them inline. This looks rather mysterious: what would constitute use that does not fall into either of these categories? If an ARIA attribute expresses a relationship that is independent of scripting, a) applues. If it expresses a relationship created by scripting, b) applies. Does the clause mean that some cases might be interpreted so that an ARIA attribute could be independent of scripting but actually isn't? Please provide some example(s) of cases a) and b) and especially other cases. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 18:07:54 UTC