W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2013

(unknown charset) Re: revisiting <hgroup> in HTML

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:18:54 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Heydon Pickering <heydon@heydonworks.com>
Cc: (unknown charset) public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130306191854977464.d2a0d3c2@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Heydon Pickering, Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:49:31 +0000:

> If the use case is for a subheading, it should be called <subheading>. In
> which case, it should

With no use case for a subheading that is not directly linked to a 
heading, then <subheading> has no great advantage over <hgroup>, IMO.
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 18:19:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:37 UTC