W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Context of the main element

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:23:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmSaOU9ZjZive3qHiLJthJAZYXjmWEc=UOxFcScOG7Gow@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Ted,

>This change would also bring our definition of
> <main> more in line with the definition of <main> in the WHATWG spec,
> and convergence is definitely a good thing.

convergence is good if what we are converging on is based on solid use
cases and data.
I have not seen anything evidence or data to support  the
specification of <main> in the form it is in the WHATWG spec.

Have you?

regards
SteveF


On 31 January 2013 21:22, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> You wrote:
>
>> It would be handy to be able to explicitly mark up the main content of
>> an article or an aside—for exactly the same reasons that it would be
>> useful to mark up the main content of a document.
>>
>> So why not?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. This change would also bring our definition of
> <main> more in line with the definition of <main> in the WHATWG spec,
> and convergence is definitely a good thing.
>
>
> Ted
>
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 22:24:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:36 UTC