W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2013

(unknown charset) Polyglot markup already exists and is already of value (Was:NU’s polyglot possibilities)

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:33:30 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
Cc: (unknown charset) "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130125053330703365.ffb5fd6b@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Alex Russell, Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:14:36 -0500:

> Under what conditions can the expectations of producers
> and consumers of polyglot documents be simplified by the addition of
> polyglot markup to their existing world/toolchain?

1. Polyglot markup exists. The question is if we should have a
   recommended spec for it.
2. PM has already created value for at least one XML tool (chain)
3. PM shows that one can create fully HTML5-conforming XHTML5 with
   XML tools. In my view, that is a pretty good value. 
4. We often cannot predict when something fails. PM implements many
   best practice principles = can help you fail less often.
5. Since it implements so many best practice principles, I see
   PM as a symbol. Many of its features are not features of 
   polyglot markup. E.g. despite some of them's opposition, PM is
   also a symbol of many of the ideas and features that the brains
   behind HTML5 has championed. By symbol I mean that while it can
   be taken literally, it also has value as inspiration and 
   compressed wisdom.

leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 04:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:30 UTC