W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Extension Specification for XHTML5 entity definitions.

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:42:58 +0000
Message-ID: <51011032.8050104@nag.co.uk>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
On 24/01/2013 07:20, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
change to the main HTML spec should be and to provide some rationale.
>> So, we'd rather not go through the motions of formally proposing
>> http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/xhtmlpubid.html
>> as a REC-track spec in /TR, however if that is required by the
>> process we are prepared to do that.
> I think it would be useful to publish that document. Creating an
> extension spec is the best path to getting this change into HTML5,
> if you can get implementation support.

Grumble. OK I think then the next step is that I ask the chairs to
make a call for consensus for publishing that as a FPWD from this WG

> For HTML 5.1, you could just file a bug to be considered by the new
> set of editors

You mean a new separate bug in bugzilla separate for the one that's
currently linked to the tracker issue (and separate from the original
one that was against the whatwg spec before all the bugs were
cloned/split?) That seems highly suboptimal for anyone reporting a bug,
surely the bug should only need be reported once, and it is the
editors' decision at what version the fix can be handled 5.0 5.x (or



The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 10:43:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:30 UTC