Henri Sivonen, Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:09:19 +0200: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> wrote: >> How are nonsensical HTML serializations acceptable but strict rules >> for dual HTML/XML serializations offensive? > > An example: An inline stylesheet with a child selector in it is a > reasonable thing to have in a document and a non-problem in text/html > and a non-problem in application/xhtml+xml. However, it's a problem in > the polyglot case. Henri, you are mistaken. * CSS: The child selector = GREATER-THAN SIGN = >. [1] * Polyglot <style>/<script> do "not contain a < or &". [2] > It doesn't make sense to create a problem where > there is none Could not have said it any better. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#child-selectors [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/#in-line-script-and-style -- leif halvard silliReceived on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 13:16:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 January 2013 13:16:56 GMT