W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Staged bugs & editorial fixes for HTML5.0, and staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:39:14 -0800
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD10D4A9.6579%lrosenth@adobe.com>

>* allow use of bitmap fonts (7587)
>
This one REALLY concerns me for a variety of reasons.  Can you point to where in the WHATWG spec this lives?

However, I can't think of a single good reason to include this in HTML – and LOTS of reasons to reject it.

Thanks,
Leonard

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 00:39:46 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Silvia Pfeiffer: "Bitmap fonts in HTML (was: Re: Staged bugs & editorial fixes for HTML5.0, and staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1)"
Previous message: Silvia Pfeiffer: "Staged bugs & editorial fixes for HTML5.0, and staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1"
In reply to: Silvia Pfeiffer: "Staged bugs & editorial fixes for HTML5.0, and staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1"
Next in thread: Maciej Stachowiak: "Re: Staged bugs & editorial fixes for HTML5.0, and staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2013 00:39:46 GMT