On 18/02/2013 17:53, Sam Ruby wrote: > Boy I wish all "HTML parsers" supported unrestricted HTML syntax. > Henri's parser is better than tagsoup which is much better than libxml2. Yes I've seen that argument (and don't actually disagree with that either) but still the fact that html parsers are in fact buggy and you can get more consistent results using XML isn't really backing up the statement to which I was replying which was that the existence of the html parser in libxml2 was evidence of support for the need for polyglot. You are rather arguing that the existence of polyglot gives a mechanism of avoiding that parser in favour of the xml one. DavidReceived on Monday, 18 February 2013 18:54:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 February 2013 18:54:06 GMT