BTW it may be after discussion that it is decided that no changes to the spec are needed as the spec is clear as it can be. regards Steve On 4 February 2013 11:48, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Judging from comments on a recent blog post [1] there appears to be some > confusion in the developer community about nav element semantics and what > it does as implemented. > > I propose that an explanatory note be added to the current definition text > to make it clear that <nav> does not equal a list > of navigation linksand that if a list of link is what is required then use > a list. > > thoughts? > > [1] http://css-tricks.com/navigation-in-lists-to-be-or-not-to-be/ > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > >Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 13:11:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 February 2013 13:11:03 GMT