Re: Context of the main element

I think so. Happy to see your proposal!
Thanks,
Silvia.

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> hi silvia,
> so I take it that the text i suggested is acceptable, if so I will include
> the chnage as part of a proposed update patch for main.
>
>
> regards
> steve
>
>
> On 3 February 2013 09:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Silvia,
>>>
>>> >Hmm... so you are suggesting it as a replacement for a <section>
>>> element?
>>>
>>>
>>> the term "main content section" phrase is not new it has been in the
>>> definition of the main element since it was initially defined.
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting it woul be better like this:
>>>
>>> "The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element> element
>>> and its children represent<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents>
>>>  the main content of the body<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-body-element> of
>>> a document or application. "
>>>
>>> if so i agree.
>>>
>>
>> Two motivations why I think it's better: <main> should be able to stand
>> independently without referring to <section> , and I want to minimize
>> differences with the WHATWG spec where possible and acceptable.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Silvia.
>>
>
>
>
> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>
>