W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2013

Re: updated cite definition - please review

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:58:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vmu70r6ukpcfbV3sLcyJqCXkX6fNR-1L0Yq3UVchJDQkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: JF <john@foliot.ca>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
hi Jon, have changed the bukowski quote, hopefully it is more palatable.

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 23 August 2013 13:42, JF <john@foliot.ca> wrote:

> Greetings Steve,
>
> While I support this edit, I would like to see a different quote used in
> the example. While personally I don't have an issue with the word ass as
> used colloquially, it might be seen as offensive in some instances
> (educationally, some cultures, etc.)
>
> Surely we can find another example that could avoid any potential
> discomfort?
>
> Cheers,
>
> JF
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
> Date: 08/23/2013 6:26 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
> Subject: updated cite definition - please review
>
>
> I have made changes to the definition of the cite element in the HTML 5.1
> editors draft
>
> new:
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/text-level-semantics.html#the-cite-element
>
> old:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/text-level-semantics.html#the-cite-element
>
> Note: the changes have no effect on implementations in browsers or
> conformance checkers.
>
>
> related bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23008
>
>
>  --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 08:59:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:34 UTC