W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2013

Re: updated cite definition - please review

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:42:17 +0200
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130823124217375433.48bb48ae@xn--mlform-iua.no>
This is probably not only related to this element, but with regard to 
the example of incorrect usage, then it irritates me that its title is 
“Code Example”, which is identical with the titles of the correct code 
examples. 

It strikes me that negative/wrong usage could be marked up as an 
<aside>. 

May be this comment should be filed as a bug …

Leif H Silli

Steve Faulkner, Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:26:32 +0200:
> I have made changes to the definition of the cite element in the HTML 5.1
> editors draft
> 
> new:
> 
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/text-level-semantics.html#the-cite-element

> 
> old: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/text-level-semantics.html#the-cite-element

> 
> Note: the changes have no effect on implementations in browsers or
> conformance checkers.
> 
> 
> related bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23008

> 
> 
> --
> 
> Regards
> 
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 10:42:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:34 UTC