- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:05:47 +0200
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
David Carlisle, Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:24:08 +0100: > On 25/04/2013 06:26, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> As part of the shift to more focus on the robustness principle, I >> wanna clarify why polyglot markup requires @type to be declared for >> script and style elements. > > I can't see any justification for requiring that. Thanks for your valuable input. I must beg you pardon. The premise of my quest was incorrect. The spec already treats all default values the same. So there is no discrepancy to solve. (I was certain that the spec did require @type for script and style, and was looking for why. But that is not the case. It has no such requirement. And never had.) -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 15:06:19 UTC