W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

[Bug 19062] New: remove reference to draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme ([JSURL])

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:02:41 +0000
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-19062-2495@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19062

           Summary: remove reference to draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme
                    ([JSURL])
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
               URL: http://www.w3.org/mid/4DFC5AC4.7030105@gmail.com
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org,
                    public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org, julian.reschke@gmx.de,
                    annevk@annevk.nl, eoconnor@apple.com,
                    evnikita2@gmail.com


This was was cloned from bug 13720 as part of operation LATER convergence.
Originally filed: 2011-08-10 02:56:00 +0000
Original reporter: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>

================================================================================
 #0   Michael[tm] Smith                               2011-08-10 02:56:04 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Probably the same is with 'javascript' URIs (Section 6.1.5).  It 
> references [JSURL], the draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme, which is 
> now expired.  It includes-by-reference the source code retrieval 
> operation for these URIs 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme-03#section-3.1).  
> I propose not to include it by reference but rather describe in the 
> specification itself.  The algorithm contains only 4 steps so it 
> shouldn't be a problem.

[split out from bug 12986]
================================================================================
 #1   Anne                                            2011-08-14 09:44:24 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
<http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html>.

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Do you mean the HTML specification ought to define the javascript
URL scheme fully?
================================================================================
 #2   Mykyta Yevstifeyev                              2011-08-14 10:09:34 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In reply to comment #1)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html>.
> 
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: Do you mean the HTML specification ought to define the javascript
> URL scheme fully?

Marked as REOPENED now. I need some time to contact Bjoern Hoehrmann, the
author of this draft, to ask whether he's going to continue work on it; then
I'll be able to answer. Please keep this bug open until there is any response
from him.
================================================================================
 #3   Ian 'Hixie' Hickson                             2011-08-15 03:51:37 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please re-assign the bug to me when there is something actionable for me. :-)
================================================================================
 #4   Mykyta Yevstifeyev                              2011-08-15 10:22:33 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did finally receive the response from Bjoern. He claims he'll continue work
on the draft; and I personally think this work will be performed by the time
HTML5 will have reached W3C Recommendation level.

I'll close the ticket as "LATER".
================================================================================

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 22:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 25 September 2012 22:02:52 GMT