W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2012

RE: Mailing Lists (was Re: Evolving AppCache discussions)

From: Martin Soukup <martin.soukup@irdeto.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:38:16 -0400
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-ID: <333F1B211D1F71488F6C74D6757F2A1002EB8E7613@CAOTT-MSG001.domain1.intra>
+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:01 AM
To: Maciej Stachowiak
Cc: HTML WG (public-html@w3.org); Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)
Subject: Re: Mailing Lists (was Re: Evolving AppCache discussions)

On 22/10/2012 21:46 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> == Possible compromise
>
> I've heard from some that the major objection to using public-html for
> certain technical discussions is not so much the other technical
> discussion, so much as administrative matters that are considered noise.
> Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug
> notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails. How would folks
> feel about having a single unified technical discussion list, and then
> one or more separate (still mandatory-subscription) lists for
> administrative matters and notifications? If we can get consensus on
> such an approach, it might supersede the need for a survey, but I will
> try to get the survey out ASAP nonetheless, perhaps including this as
> an option.

+1

--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 13:39:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC