W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2012

Fwd: Working Group Last Call on Registration Documents

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:29:45 +0200
Message-ID: <50863959.9030109@gmx.de>
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
(FYI)


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Working Group Last Call on Registration Documents
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:13:22 +0000
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:12:56 +1100
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

The editors and I believe that the following drafts are ready for 
Working Group Last Call:

* Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations
   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-10

* Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication Scheme 
Registrations
   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-05

Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any remaining 
issues, or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the attention 
of the Working Group on this list.

As a reminder, these documents are intended to define the *initial* 
contents for their respective registries.

WGLC will end on November 25th.


Providing Feedback
----------------

Your input should be sent to this mailing list, clearly marked with 
"WGLC" and the appropriate part. E.g., with Subject lines such as:

Subject: WGLC review of authscheme-registrations
Subject: WGLC issue: "foo" in method-registrations

Issues that you believe to be editorial in nature (e.g., typos, 
suggested re-phrasing) can be grouped together in a single e-mail. 
Substantive issues (what we call "design" issues) that may need 
discussion should be sent one per e-mail, with a descriptive subject.

If you disagree with the resolution of a previously discussed issue, 
you're encouraged to note that at this time.


What's Next
-----------

The Working Group will discuss these issues, re-issuing drafts as 
necessary. Tickets raised on these drafts will have a severity of "In WG 
Last Call" , and once they are disposed of, we'll see if there's 
consensus on going to IETF Last Call on them.

Thanks again to the editors for their hard work in getting to this point.

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 06:30:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC