W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2012

Fwd: Working Group Last Call for HTTP/1.1 p1 and p2

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:29:26 +0200
Message-ID: <507BAD46.7040900@gmx.de>
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
(FYI)


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Working Group Last Call for HTTP/1.1 p1 and p2
Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:54:14 +0000
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:53:43 +1100
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

The editors and I believe that the following drafts are ready for 
Working Group Last Call:

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing
   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content
   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-21

Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any remaining 
issues, or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the attention 
of the Working Group on this list.

Please note that both of these parts has recently been substantially 
rewritten by Roy, just as I rewrote p6 a while back. As such, we're 
treating those changes as a proposal from the editors to the Working 
Group, to be confirmed. Please review carefully with this in mind.

To give people ample time to review, we'll have a six-week WGLC, ending 
on November 25.

However, I encourage early reviews; feedback and issues raised before 
the Atlanta meeting gives us the opportunity to discuss it face-to-face.

Providing Feedback
----------------

Your input should be sent to this mailing list, clearly marked with 
"WGLC" and the appropriate part. E.g., with Subject lines such as:

Subject: WGLC review of p1-messaging
Subject: WGLC issue: "foo" in p2

Issues that you believe to be editorial in nature (e.g., typos, 
suggested re-phrasing) can be grouped together in a single e-mail. 
Substantive issues (what we call "design" issues) that may need 
discussion should be sent one per e-mail, with a descriptive subject.

If you disagree with the resolution of a previously discussed issue, 
you're encouraged to note that at this time.

What's Next
-----------

The Working Group will discuss these issues, re-issuing drafts as 
necessary. Tickets raised on these drafts will have a severity of "In WG 
Last Call" , and once they are disposed of, we'll see if there's 
consensus on going to IETF Last Call on them.

Thanks again to the editors for their hard work in getting to this point.

Regards,

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 06:29:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC