W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2012

Re: A11y TF Amendment [was: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-10-04]

From: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:51:07 +0100
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20121010095107.GD1852@stripey.com>
Maciej Stachowiak writes:

> On Oct 10, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote:
>
> > [Proposed addition to Accessibility Task Force work statement:]
> 
> > >  Members of either Working Group who have technical comments or
> > >  objections on Task Force publications are expected to raise them
> > >  in the context of the Task Force.
> > 
> > What's the effect of "expected" there in practice?
> 
> The way I expect this to work is that if someone makes an objection at
> the transition stage, they'll be asked to make that objection to the
> Task Force, e.g. by email or via a bugzilla bug against the relevant
> specification.

That sounds like a good process.

> That being said, making comments on Task Force deliverables should not
> require joining the Task Force.
> 
> Does this sufficiently answer your questions?

It does, thank you.

I think the proposed work statement wording could be clearer on this,
perhaps:

  Members of either Working Group who have technical comments or
  objections on Task Force publications can raise them with the Task
  Force, e.g. by email or via a bugzilla bug against the relevant
  specification.

But I'm not objecting to the current wording.

Cheers

Smylers
-- 
New series of TV puzzle show 'Only Connect' (some questions by me)
Mondays at 20:30 on BBC4, or iPlayer: http://www.bbc.co.uk/onlyconnect
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 09:51:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 October 2012 09:51:31 GMT