Re: Initial work on an extension specification for <img srcset>

On 02/10/2012 02:47 , Mathew Marquis wrote:
> There’s a great deal of overlap between this proposal and the current
> `picture` proposal (
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-file/tip/responsive-images/responsive-images.html ),
> though `picture` does involve a portion of the `srcset`
> functionality. How do we best address this? Should the Responsive Images
> Community Group prepare a change proposal based on the WHATWG draft, or
> should we hold off for the time being?

I wouldn't worry about merging those just yet — at this point I think it 
is more important to try to reach agreement on how this works. The 
actual text wrangling can follow

> We’re putting together a comprehensive list of use case comparisons —
> how each pattern might address some of the use cases we’ve nailed down —
> and I’d like to see proponents of the `srcset` pattern contribute to
> this as well:
> https://github.com/Wilto/draft-prop/blob/master/UseCaseComparisons.md

I think that this would be very useful indeed.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon