W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:41:17 -0500
Message-ID: <50B5EA4D.3090905@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
On 11/28/2012 05:08 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/09/2012 10:30 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Whatever might have been said or what you might have thought
>>>> you heard,
>>>
>>> I donít appreciate discrediting my listening comprehension en
>>> passant.
>>
>> I wasn't present, but the meeting minutes do not reflect any
>> statement that work on the Rationale was to be done *instead* of
>> following the documented process:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-html-wg-minutes.html#item12
>>
>> Perhaps it wasn't captured.  Perhaps all the necessary people
>> weren't in the room.  In any case, it is a clear policy of this
>> working group that decisions are not made off-list.
>
> I think the minutes may not adequately reflect what was discussed. I
> have now marked the relevant existing bugs as TrackerRequest, based
> on Henri and Lachlan's clearly stated intent in the 2f2. I hope this
> puts us on track to correctly following the documented process.

We still have Formal Objections which have not been withdrawn.  Are we 
to proceed within the working group or are we to forward this matter to 
the Director?

> Regards, Maciej

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 10:41:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC