W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Alt-Techniques Formal Objection Rationale

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:23:08 -0500
Message-ID: <50B4DADC.6020806@intertwingly.net>
To: public-html@w3.org
CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
On 11/19/2012 08:14 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 07:19 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> At the HTML F2F, I was asked to provide rationale for my previously
>> filed formal objection to "HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text
>> alternatives" (alt-techniques).
>
> At TPAC, there was also discussion of an alternative path to
> resolution[1].  Repeating what I previously stated[2], in case it was
> overlooked due to the subject line:
>
> If the Formal Objections on this matter[3] are not withdrawn, they will
> be forwarded for consideration by the Director as we proceed to CR.  If
> they are withdrawn, we will proceed with the Working Group decision
> process[4] on this matter.

Once again, I will ask if you both if you wish to proceed with the 
Working Group decision process or if you wish this to be processed as a 
Formal Objection at this time.

If you wish to proceed via a Working Group decision, please indicate 
that you are withdrawing your Formal Objection (without prejudice) and 
opening a bug on the relevant specification.

> - Sam Ruby
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-html-wg-minutes.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0141.html
> [3] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html
> [4]
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 15:23:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 November 2012 15:23:43 GMT