W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:30:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQvAueOFTyN7FowdmyBApLoZPOty33CHsWCmOC1C8dP8Yk2Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Whatever might have been said or what you might
> have thought you heard,

I don’t appreciate discrediting my listening comprehension en passant.

> I will once again state that the process is quite
> clear that the next step after the editors initial decision is indeed a bug
> report:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec

It seems hard to work with this group if a participant can’t trust the
word of two out of three chairs that steps of a procedure have been
waived. I should have followed my instinct to do everything according
to the written procedure anyway:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19923

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 15:31:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 November 2012 15:31:33 GMT