W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: [HTMLWG] CfC: Create a Mailing List for administrative matters and notifications?

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:40:16 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=YvX-+TGbtFToDUgMKPYLycutpdzfK0bqb=0ZO2H4K5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
I like the idea of moving administrative matters to another list.

Regards,
Silvia.

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 10/22/2012 03:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
>>
>> I've heard from some that the major objection to using public-html for
>> certain technical discussions is not so much the other technical
>> discussion, so much as administrative matters that are considered noise.
>> Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug
>> notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails. How would folks
>> feel about having a single unified technical discussion list, and then
>> one or more separate (still mandatory-subscription) lists for
>> administrative matters and notifications? If we can get consensus on
>> such an approach, it might supersede the need for a survey, but I will
>> try to get the survey out ASAP nonetheless, perhaps including this as an
>> option.
>>
>
> This proposal got some support and if there was any objections, I missed
> it.  This Call for Consensus is intended to determine if there are indeed
> any objections.
>
> So to be clear: the proposal is to create another mailing list and to
> redirect the types of discussions described above to that mailing list.  If
> this call passes, the name of that mailing list would be determined by W3C
> staff, though constructive suggestions are welcome.
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by
> Wednesday, November 13th, 2012. Positive response is welcome and silence
> will be considered as agreement with the proposal.
>
> If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 20:41:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC