Hi Sam, John, and all, Sam, thank you for the pointers to the Face -to-Face minutes. John, thanks again for disentangling the proposed the draft revisions from the accessibility task force consensus change proposal. Best Regards, Laura http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Apr/0222.html http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 05/07/2012 01:21 PM, Laura Carlson wrote: >> >> >> I may be forced to revert my CP withdrawal >> and pursue my document further. > > > I encourage you to read the meeting minutes. In particular, I'll highlight > that material that I think you should focus on. > > There likely would be a strong objection to Cynthia's and (and possibly > your) proposal(s): > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20120505#l-142 > > The basis of this was a statement that the spec text as drafted would > specifically preclude UAs (including browsers) from ever giving a better > experience: > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20120504#l-2920 > > On the other hand, there didn't seem to be anybody in the room opposed to > giving authors strong guidance that they can't depend on such behavior, > e.g.: > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20120504#l-2903 > > At this point, I'm not suggesting any specific action, other than reviewing > this discussion. You are welcome to re-propose your proposal, with or > without change. Just be aware that not making a change in response to what > may turn out to be a strong objection could negatively affect the chances of > your proposal being selected. > > - Sam Ruby -- Laura L. CarlsonReceived on Thursday, 10 May 2012 12:02:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 May 2012 12:02:45 GMT