W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:00:48 +0100
To: "Cameron Jones" <cmhjones@gmail.com>
Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org, "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>
Message-ID: <op.wbko3mp664w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:50:02 +0100, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> In the "Risks" section of the proposal i have documented and addressed
> the anticipated security concern.

That is not very clear. Also, that should be part of the details section  
if so.


> While CORS is referenced in HTML it is not a pre-requesite for
> implementations.

It is.


> HTTP is the deployment i am referring to and it is interaction with
> this protocol which the proposal recommends. You have raised concern
> that further information is required for specification however i am
> stating that further information is not required - or available  - as
> it is already under specification, implementation and deployment on a
> global scale and with universal adoption.

This is nonsense given the context of what is available to web pages today.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:02:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:31 UTC