- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:39:08 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, 'xn--mlform-iua@målform.no' <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "rubys@intertwingly.net" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "mjs@apple.com" <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Silvia Pfeiffer, Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:09:48 +1100: > Therefore, since we agree that what matters is > the UI and how it functions in the UI, there is no distinction between > a paused frame and the poster. On this, I agree with you and Janina. > Therefore, from a logical and UI point of view, the jpg is > indeed part of the video and its genesis does not matter. Right. But what implications do we draw from this? For example: It was agreed, I think, between David and Sean that the poster does not need to be taken from the video *file*. But even so: What if I find a nice picture that I *do* include in the video file, as its first frame, because some UA that I care about do not support the @poster attribute? Thus: I think it doesn't matter that it is part of the video. What matters is that it - the frame or the more or less accidental image file - has been chosen as poster. A poster is, in principle, not a presentational image - the assumption is that the poster tries to tell us why we should take the time to play the video. -- Leif H Silli
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 23:39:43 UTC