W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Revert request r7023

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:40:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4F67EE25.7010709@intertwingly.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
On 03/16/2012 05:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 05:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>> On 03/16/2012 05:22 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:46:40 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr.
>>>> <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> At the request of the chairs, I'd like to reiterate my opposal to
>>>>> reverting this. Same reasons as before.
>>>>
>>>> To make it more explicit, I also object to reverting this per prior
>>>> given arguments.
>>>
>>> I encourage all those who might oppose this revert request to respond
>>> to the
>>> existing call for proposals on ISSUE-201:
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0267.html
>>
>> I am not ready to respond to that issue. I'd wait until Hixie is done
>> with his edits, as I agree with what he's doing on this front (I
>> helped somewhat in designing them).
>
> If this feature is not ready for HTML5, there always is HTML.next.

After conferring with my co-chairs, if no Change Proposal is produced in 
response to issue 201, we will proceed to a Call for Consensus on the 
Change Proposal that we do have.  As a part of that Call for Consensus. 
  Should that Call for Consensus pass, we will request that r7023 be 
reverted.

>> ~TJ
>
> - Sam Ruby

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 02:41:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:31 UTC