On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > As this proposal has identified no use cases, no users, and no >> implementors, the chairs have decided that we will not proceed to a >> survey until or one or more of these problems with the first proposal is >> addressed. If this is not done, we will decide in favor of the "no >> change" change proposal instead. >> > > Glenn: please let us know your plans for this. If we do not hear back > from somebody who intends to address these points by March 22nd, 2012, we > will decide in favor of the "no change" change proposal at that time. Although I said I expected to provide an update to the 179 CP during last week's telcon, I have, after further consideration, decided to not pursue the proposal further at this time. If, in the future, the ZCP is found ineffective, I may re-raise the issue, but I have no plans to do so at this time. Regards, GlennReceived on Thursday, 8 March 2012 01:36:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:21 UTC