W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2012

RE: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:18:00 +0000
To: "Edward O'Connor (ted@oconnor.cx)" <ted@oconnor.cx>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)" <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37F09D40F@TK5EX14MBXC121.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
>> If this is not done by the 20th of June, we will consider this proposal to be withdrawn.

Due to the large number of outstanding HTML WG actions that Ted is working on, the Chairs have agreed to move this deadline to 6th of July.

/paulc
HTML WG co-chair

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 7:28 PM
To: public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals

On 06/07/2012 04:58 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> Sam wrote:
>
>> On 03/27/2012 04:36 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>>> Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Review of the following proposal:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189
>>>>
>>>> While there may be additional feedback should Julian's proposal be 
>>>> updated, this feedback is focused on what is being proposed,
>>>> specifically: "Alter the appearance".
>>>>
>>>> As the appearance of the section of the specification under 
>>>> consideration is fundamental to what is being proposed in this 
>>>> specific proposal, and as the editor seems to believe that what 
>>>> currently is in the spec is sufficiently visually distinct from 
>>>> IANA registrations to prevent confusion, please obtain and 
>>>> incorporate any feedback you feel is necessary from the editor 
>>>> prior to this proposal being included in a call for consensus or survey.
>>>
>>> Will do!
>>
>> If this is not done by the 20th of June, we will consider this 
>> proposal to be withdrawn.
>
> I haven't felt that any feedback from the editor is necessary. Is that 
> sufficient for us to proceed to a survey on ISSUE-189 now? If not, 
> I've CC'ed the editor. Ian, is the Change Proposal in [1] sufficiently 
> clear for you to make any necessary edits, should it be adopted? Thanks.

Please remove the following text: "One such alteration is provided, as an example, in the diff below. The editor is free to apply this diff or to make such alterations as he deems sufficient to disambiguate this section from the various IANA registrations in the spec. "

Concurrently, feel free to modify the patch provided based on input from Ian or anybody else you wish.  Let us know when this is complete.

> Ted
>
> 1. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-189

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 22:18:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 June 2012 22:18:41 GMT