Re: transcript="" proposal (ACTION-211 for ISSUE-194)

I wrote:
>> [I] don't think we should be trying to do this in the HTML5
>> timeframe. But, if we *do* decide to address this problem now, I much
>> prefer the mechanism described in my ISSUE-194-2B proposal over the
>> TranscriptElement proposal.

Silvia replied:
> I would actually agree with Ted - I'd prefer we take our time to come
> up with a proper solution to the transcript problem rather than
> rushing it. Further implementation experience would definitely help.

Awesome. In that case, could we drop both the nonzero-change proposals
and proceed with a CfC on the zero-edit CP?


Ted

Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 23:29:39 UTC