- From: Matthew Turvey <mcturvey@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:09:50 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 27 July 2012 19:36, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Two corrections below (copy/paste errors). Sorry for the confusion. Kudos > to mjs for spotting them. > > - Sam Ruby > > > On 07/27/2012 11:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two >> proposals. >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4 >> >> In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some >> indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity >> to update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate >> as to how long that would take. >> >> So regarding the "LongdescZeroEdit" proposal[1]... >> >> 1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the >> InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you >> estimate that it would take? > > > Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ... > > >> 2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be >> selected, would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if > > > Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ... > > >> so, how long do you estimate that it would take? I'm not planning to update the LongdescZeroEdit proposal. >> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescZeroEdit -Matt
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 12:10:18 UTC