W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "LongdescZeroEdit" - outlook

From: Matthew Turvey <mcturvey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:09:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFp5+Aq_Kcm3XhGz0GON1NyMSBRjf7O40PuaL-_hGRxfuJh0_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 27 July 2012 19:36, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Two corrections below (copy/paste errors).  Sorry for the confusion. Kudos
> to mjs for spotting them.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
> On 07/27/2012 11:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two
>> proposals.
>>
>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden
>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4
>>
>> In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some
>> indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity
>> to update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate
>> as to how long that would take.
>>
>> So regarding the "LongdescZeroEdit" proposal[1]...
>>
>> 1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the
>> InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you
>> estimate that it would take?
>
>
> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ...
>
>
>> 2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be
>> selected, would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if
>
>
> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ...
>
>
>> so, how long do you estimate that it would take?

I'm not planning to update the LongdescZeroEdit proposal.

>> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescZeroEdit

-Matt
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 12:10:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:33 UTC