W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Proposed adaptive image element

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:46:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpveZ9rgB_ZU9a5TYF2m+RHNWxMV+zrgMvdwzFYZdnc+pDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: public-html@w3.org, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi David,

>  I would argue that
>  almost all new features should go to the continuous "living
>  standard" version first.

One of the problems with that approach is accessibility of the
features may be lacking when it reaches the HTML WG level thus
requiring retrofitting, i.e. canvas. My hope is that an accessible
adaptive image element is specified by design.

Best Regards,
Laura

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:12 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25/07/2012 13:45, Laura Carlson wrote:
>>
>> It would be good to get other opinions. Should specification of
>> adaptive images be postponed? What do working group members think are
>> the pros and cons of postponing?
>
>
>
> HTML5 makes a lot of sense as a stable, edited version of HTML,
> that people and HTML generators can target.
>
> But as such, it should be a _subset_ of the facilities implemented in
> browsers. Editorial work on HTML5 should be restricted to clarifying and
> formalising the moving target which is that WhatWG spec and actual
> implementation coverage.
>
> If new features requiring browser implementation are added to HTML5
> without being implemented in browsers and without being added to the
> WhatWG version then that is going to be confusing for everybody and
> makes HTML5 lose its rationale as being a stable snapshot of the ongoing
> html development.
>
> So given the model of a continuous development happening at WhatWG
> (either thought of as an organisation or as a W3C Community Group) and
> development of numbered specifications happening here, I would argue
> that almost all new features should go to the continuous "living
> standard" version first. (Practically speaking that is likely to be the
> quickest root to getting trial implementations in browsers as well).
>
> David
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>



-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 16:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:33 UTC