- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 18:44:19 -0700
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
On 8/5/12 3:25 PM, "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> >wrote: >> in any of the above a conforming HTML5 authoring tool would be useless >>if it >> could not emit the documents. > >Maybe we should say that a conforming HTML5 authoring tool MAY emit >"non-conforming HTML5 documents" but MUST make the author informed of >the (machine-assessable) conformance status of the document when >emitting. Wouldn't that require that all HTML5 authoring/generation tools have to include (and/or link to) some validator?? That seems like quite a burden to place on authoring tools Leonard
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 01:44:58 UTC