W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2012

RE: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:49:07 +0000
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37FC1593A@TK5EX14MBXC289.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Steve:

Are you willing to withdraw your change proposal at:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/hitregions
in favour of the change proposal at:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-201  ?

If so then the Chairs will proceed with a Call For Consensus on http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-201 

/paulc
HTML WG co-chair

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Edward O'Connor [mailto:eoconnor@apple.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 12:20 PM
To: Frank Olivier
Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; Steve Faulkner; Richard Schwerdtfeger; public-html-a11y@w3.org; public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Updates to Issue-201 Change Proposal per our conversation

Hi Frank,

You wrote:

> Steve's proposed text below looks reasonable; I believe this addition 
> sufficiently explains the correct usage for authors.

I assume this is the change we're supposed to review:

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/index.php?title=User%3AEoconnor%2FISSUE-201&diff=13295&oldid=13278

If so, it looks fine to me.


Ted
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 16:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:33 UTC