W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2012

RE: Change proposal for Issue 203

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:26:40 +0000
To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> (jbrewer@w3.org)" <jbrewer@w3.org>
CC: 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E3EACD022300B94D88613639CF4E25F83D2E59E6@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> If these problems are not addressed by April 2nd, the chairs will treat this proposal as withdrawn.

Please note that this deadline is today.  If not revised CP is provided then ISSUE-203 is going to be POSTPONED.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:10 AM
To: John Foliot
Cc: 'HTML WG'; public-html-a11y@w3.org
Subject: Re: Change proposal for Issue 203

On 03/02/2012 07:39 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 03:59 AM, John Foliot wrote:
>> Please find a Change Proposal for Issue 203 located at:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/Issue203
>
> The chairs do not accept this proposal.

If these problems are not addressed by April 2nd, the chairs will treat this proposal as withdrawn.

- Sam Ruby

> If you wish to pursue this matter, please submit a proposal which 
> identifies at least one change over and above that which is specified 
> in the dependencies identified, removes any dependency on issue 142, 
> and is consistent with at least one scenario concerning the possible 
> resolutions of issues 30 and 194.
>
> Change Proposals can't be dependent on the outcome of a Formal 
> Objection as they need to be resolved prior to the point where Formal 
> Objections are resolved.
>
> As to the dependency on issue 194, the proposal for 203 is 
> inconsistent with the Change Proposal pointed to, which states:
>
>  > Should this Issue be resolved by reinstating @longdesc in HTML5, 
> the  > use of @longdesc to address the use-cases envisioned would 
> likely be  > sufficient, making this proposal redundant.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 20:27:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:31 UTC