[Bug 14481] New: There should be a h element because h1..h6 imply semantics of level which are misleading when using nested sections. Btw.: I liked XHTML 2.0 much better than this stuff. Honestly, it's crap.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14481

           Summary: There should be a h element because h1..h6 imply
                    semantics of level which are misleading when using
                    nested sections. Btw.: I liked XHTML 2.0 much better
                    than this stuff. Honestly, it's crap.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top

Comment:
There should be a h element because h1..h6 imply semantics of level which are
misleading when using nested sections.
Btw.: I liked XHTML 2.0 much better than this stuff. Honestly, it's crap.

Posted from: 193.108.184.61
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 13:58:39 UTC