W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2011

Re: "How Browsers Process URLs" aka "URL processing spec": HTML WG deliverable or I18N WG deliverable?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:18:47 +0100
Message-ID: <4ECA41A7.5000405@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
On 2011-11-21 12:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:17:09 +0100, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
>> I will be discussing that draft with the W3C I18N WG during their weekly
>> telcon tomorrow. One thing we are likely to discuss is whether that spec
>> should be a deliverable of the I18N WG, or whether it should be a
>> deliverable of the HTML WG.
>
> I think it should be defined in this draft (i.e. together with the URL
> API):
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/url/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
> Which WG ends up defining URLs I could care less about. Though it would
> probably make sense if they reused the mailing list we have been using
> for URLs thus far.

Most discussions I have seen happened on the IRI mailing list. Is this 
the one you are referring to?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 12:19:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:41 GMT