W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2011

Re: ISSUE-133 modal-attribute - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:57:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4EC261A2.4060203@intertwingly.net>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/14/2011 06:06 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com
> <mailto:eoconnor@apple.com>> wrote:
>
>      > Reminder: this closes Saturday…
>
>     Indeed. Here is the completed Change Proposal:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-133
>
> Even though you've introduced a new stacking context rule that requires
> layout engine changes, it still probably doesn't do everything you want.
> For example if the <dialog> element is contained in a container with CSS
> 'opacity', 'filter', 'transform', 'clip-path' or 'mask' then your dialog
> element won't appear the way you want it to.
>
> We probably should align this with the fullscreen API to ensure they use
> the same mechanism for placing stuff "on top of the page". There's a
> discussion about this going on in the WHATWG list.

Rob, do you object to the chairs declaring that we have consensus on 
Ted's proposal, and if so, when do you expect that an Alternate or 
Counter proposal will be brought forward?

> Rob

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 12:57:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:41 GMT