W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2011

Re: noted 3 issues re: time/data (was Re: minutes for HTML WG f2f, 2011-11-04, part 1)

From: Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:38:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG21KW=xKP4RzOa6G9gZ4ZMw==P37EPXTnpFOdS2HujmD2rRKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-html@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
2011/11/15 Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>
> What would it take for you to decide?  My intent isn't to rush anybody, but
> to see if we can avoid any unnecessary work.  For example, if there is
> nobody who wishes to defend the pubdate attribute then that issue need not
> be discussed further.
>
> Given the issues that Tantek has outlined, it looks like you might want to
> object to up to two of the change proposals that he has produced: the one
> for the time element and that introduces the data element.
>
> Of course even better than submitting a counter proposal would be to see if
> you and (in this case) Tantek can work together to produce a common proposal
> that you can both live with.
>
> My recommendation: if you aren't sure on a particular aspect, it probably
> isn't worth objecting on that aspect.
>
>> - Peter Winnberg
>
> - Sam Ruby>

I have created a very rough first draft of a proposal so that people
can get a better idea of what I mean that can be found here:

http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Pwinnber/content_attribute

I will continue to work on it and add more detail, and see if I can
respond to feedback / objections to it.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:38:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:28 UTC